Swearing and Threats in a Google Review: What Comes Down and What Stays

2026-09-24

A review on your profile swears, threatens, or does both. Perhaps it tells your staff to watch themselves. Perhaps it promises a lawyer, a complaint to Fair Trading and a post in every local Facebook group. Perhaps it is just a string of asterisks aimed at the person who served them.

Some of this comes down and some of it stays, and the dividing lines are not where most owners expect. There are two rules in play, and each has its own test.

Two rules, two different tests

Threats and swearing feel like the same kind of problem: aggressive language on a page where you would like calm feedback. Google handles them under different policies.

• Threats of harm fall under Harassment. The test is whether the reviewer says they, or someone, will hurt a person or damage property.
• Swearing falls under Obscenity & profanity. The test is whether the profanity has a target: a person, or your business.

Neither rule cares whether the reviewer is a real customer, or whether their complaint was fair. A real customer with a real grievance who crosses either line has written a review that can come down. That is why reviews like these are among the ones we get removed most readily.

Threats of harm: report them, and report the serious ones to police

A threat of harm is a statement that the reviewer will hurt someone or damage your property. It does not have to be spelled out. Menace counts.

Wording that qualifies (invented examples):

• "I know which car is yours. Enjoy the drive home."
• "Someone should put a brick through that window, and it might be me."

Report it from Google's Reviews Management Tool as Bullying or harassment. The same reason appears on the public listing and in the Maps app. If the report is declined and you appeal, the policy to type is Harassment, and the appeal quotes the threat exactly as written.

Take a screenshot before you report anything. If a review makes you fear for anyone's safety, report it to police as well, on 000 if the danger is immediate. A Google report and a police report are separate things. Google can take the words down. Only police can deal with the person.

Keep a record for both. Note the date the review appeared, save the reviewer's profile name and link, and keep any earlier emails, messages or incidents involving the same person. If the threat names a member of your team, tell them before they find it themselves, and let them decide whether they want to be involved in the police report.

That staff member can also report the review from their own Google account, under the same reason. It is their safety being threatened, so it is their report to make. Asking other staff, friends or family to report it as well is treated as manipulation, so keep it to the people actually named or threatened.

Threats to sue, complain or "tell everyone" stay

This is where owners most often waste a report. A reviewer who says they are going to a lawyer, a regulator or the local community is not threatening harm. They are describing what they plan to do next, and every one of those things is their right.

Wording that only looks similar:

• "My solicitor will be in touch."
• "I'm reporting you to Fair Trading and telling everyone I know."

Neither is a breach, however hostile it feels. The right answer is a public reply, written calmly for the next customer rather than for the reviewer: say you are sorry it has reached this point, state your policy in one plain sentence, and invite them to contact you directly to resolve it. A reply like that shows every reader that the business behaves well under pressure, which is exactly what they came to find out.

If the threat arrived before the review, at the counter or in an email, our post on a customer threatening a bad Google review covers how to handle it.

Swearing with a target

Profanity used to insult someone, or to hammer the criticism home, is a breach of Obscenity & profanity. The word to hold on to is target. Swearing pointed at a person or at your business is the case.

Wording that qualifies (invented examples):

• "What an absolute f***ing joke of a business."
• "The useless sh*t behind the counter couldn't find a pen."

Wording that only looks similar:

• "The food was crap." One mild word, used once, about a plate of food.

Report targeted swearing as Profanity, a reason offered on every reporting screen. If you appeal, the policy to type is Obscenity & profanity. A mild word in passing, on a review that is otherwise a calm account, is worth a free report at most. Do not spend your one appeal on it.

The wording in the appeal is what carries it: quote, rule, the link between them, and nothing about what happened at the counter. The Google Review Removal Playbook has the template for this breach, and for threats, each with a worked example.

Masked swearing still counts

Reviewers often mask the word with asterisks or symbols, perhaps thinking it keeps them within the rules. It does not change what the word is. "Sh*t service" is still swearing, and everyone reading it knows exactly what it says.

Two practical points follow:

• Do not skip a review because the swearing is masked. Read it as a customer would.
• Quote it exactly as written, asterisks and all. Do not unmask it and do not tidy it up. Your appeal's strength is that it shows the reviewer's own words, character for character, so the person reading it can match your quote to the review in seconds.

When a review swears at and attacks a named employee

Sometimes one review does everything: it names a staff member, swears at them, and says they have no business doing their job. You could report that as Profanity or as Bullying or harassment, and it is a tie-break worth knowing.

Pick Bullying or harassment, and appeal under Harassment. Swearing aimed at a named employee combined with a personal attack on them is the strongest everyday case there is. The harassment reason covers the whole of what the review does to that person, where the profanity reason covers only the word. Our post on reviews that attack a staff member by name explains where that line sits, including a manager's case we won on appeal.

Remember the limits. Naming a staff member is allowed. The breach is the attack on them, and the swearing is what makes it strongest.

The reply, for everything that stays

Threats to sue, a single "crap", a furious account with no target for the anger: these stay up, and your reply is what the next customer reads beneath them.

A good reply here is short, and it does not mirror the tone. Do not quote the swearing, do not repeat the threat back, and do not mention that you have reported the review. Acknowledge the specific thing they were unhappy about, say what you have done about it or what your normal practice is, and give a direct way to reach you. Our negative Google review reply templates post explains which approach fits which review.

Post the reply the same day you report. If the review comes down, the reply goes with it.

When you next read an aggressive review, ask two questions before anything else: is someone being threatened with harm, and is the swearing aimed at someone. A yes to either means report it today; two noes mean the reply is your move.

Several locations or a group? Talk to us about a managed service · Popular locations: Sydney · Melbourne · Brisbane · Perth · Adelaide · Gold Coast · all locations